Somewhere in the snowy mountains of eastern Turkey, a determined team set out to find the lost ark of Noah.
With radar, cameras, and sheer stubbornness, they say they pulled it off.
They found what they called a man-made wooden structure 4,800 years old.
But will scientists ever accept that evidence?
Can ancient wood on a mountain really prove a Bible story?
Join me as we uncover what happened on Mount Ararat.
I’m Ambrose Wild and this trail runs from a crowded press room in Hong Kong to a spy plane flying along the old Soviet border.
It was the 25th of April 2010 and a room full of reporters in Hong Kong was listening to a group of evangelical explorers make one of the biggest claims in biblical archaeology.
They called themselves Noah’s Arc Ministries International, an offshoot of a Hong Kong group called Media Evangelism.
They had Chinese and Turkish team members, a film crew, and photographs taken high on Mount Ararat, somewhere around 12,000 to 13,000 ft up, buried in ice and volcanic rubble.
The way they told it, the search had taken years.
Team members said they’d first found seven large wooden compartments under the snow back in 2007 and 2008.
Then in 2008, a local guide told them he knew exactly where the ark was.
The team followed him up and in the ice they found what they described as wooden rooms, beams, and hallways.
The kind of compartments you’d expect inside a giant ship.
In October 2009, six members went inside.
One of them, the filmmaker Young Wing Chun, put it like this.
It’s not 100% that it is Noah’s Ark, but we think it is 99.9% that this is it.
Then came the number that went around the world.
Wood from the structure had been sent off for radiocarbon dating at a university in Tehran, according to the team’s coordinator, Clara Wei, and it came back at about 4,800 years old.
For a lot of Bible readers, that sits right around the time of the flood.
We pointed to planks some 20 m long and asked how anyone could have carried timber like that up to that height.
And she said, “The only record of a wooden structure on Mount Ararat is Noah’s Ark.
Even two local officials in Agri province, the left tenant governor and the region’s culture director said the find was likely the real thing.
But the explorers made one decision that would follow them for years.
They wouldn’t say where it was.
Telling the world, they argued would bring the looters.
I mean, think about that for a second.
A ship on a mountain, a date that lines up with Genesis, and a location nobody outside the team was allowed to check.
And they weren’t the only ones claiming the ark.
About 29 km south of the summit in the hills above the town of Dogabayazit, there’s a long boat-shaped mound of earth and rock called the Durapinar site.
It’s 538 ft long.
In October 1959, a Turkish army captain named Ilhan Durupinar spotted it in an aerial photo taken by the Turkish Air Force during a NATO mapping flight and the site has carried his name ever since.
Local accounts say it had only come to light about 10 years earlier on the 19th of May 1948 after heavy rains and three earthquakes shook the hillside and a Kurdish shepherd named Rasheed Saran was the first to notice it.
In 1960, Life magazine published the photographs.
For decades, believers have gone back to that mound with ground penetrating radar.
One of them is Andrew Jones, who founded a group called Noah’s Arc Scans.
A survey in 2019 reported voids, straight lines, and angles, and what the team called possible corridors, and chamberlike spaces.
And in August of this year, a new radar survey led by an engineer named Kosro Bactar, who spent four decades building detection systems for the US military, reported a long anomaly, about 250 ft, running through the middle of the formation, which the team compared to a tunnel or a hallway.
The scans, they said, do not show the formation as a simple homogeneous mass of rock.
To their credit, they added the caveat themselves.
Radar anomalies, they wrote, do not prove an archaeological origin.
So on Ararat, there’s a wooden structure nobody’s allowed to visit.
And down the road, there’s a hill that people say has a ship inside it.
At the time, both seem to point the same way.
But the one thing on that mountain that really was hidden from the world turned out to be something nobody in Hong Kong was talking about, and we’ll get to it.
Here’s the detail almost nobody in that Hong Kong room knew.
One of the experts who’d worked with the expedition had already walked away from it.
His name was Randall Price, an evangelical archaeologist from Liberty University who had led several trips up Ararat himself.
He was part of the team in 2008, and he’d quit over doubts about the honesty of the local guide, the same man who had led them to the site.
Within days of the press conference, he was telling reporters the find may not withstand closer observation and that proper analysis may show this to be a hoax.
Then one of his emails leaked.
In it, Price said he believed local Kurdish men had hauled big wooden beams from an old structure near the Black Sea and planted them on the mountain and that more wood was put inside a cave there in the summer of 2009.
He said he had photos from inside the so-called ark showing cobwebs in the rafters, which he said was just not possible in those conditions.
That’s a serious charge, and the team rejected it.
Their coordinator told reporters, “We don’t have anything to hide.”
Another expert who had advised them, John Morris, doubted that local workers could have hauled that much wood up there, though he called the evidence inconclusive.
The scientists weren’t any kinder.
The archaeologist Paul Zamansky of Stonybrook University said he didn’t know of any expedition that ever went looking for the ark and didn’t find it.
The biologist Todd Wood of Brian College said he was really, really skeptical.
And the Bible scholar Jack Sassin pointed at the text itself.
The Bible, he said, tells you the ark landed somewhere in Uratu, an ancient kingdom that covered a whole region.
Even Turkey wasn’t sure what to do with it.
The culture minister Ertigril Gune welcomed the news as a boost for tourism and at the same time ordered an investigation into how wood samples had left Turkey for Hong Kong in the first place.
And the Durupinar mound has a story just like it.
In September 1960, an expedition went up with Durupinar himself and a professor of photoggramometry named Arthur Brandenburgger.
They dug and used dynamite for two days, found soil and rocks, and announced the formation was a freak of nature and not man-made.
Then in 1977, an American named Ron Wyatt took up the site and spent years promoting it as the ark.
In 1985, he was joined by David Fold, who swept the mound with radar and an instrument he called a frequency generator, tuned, he said, to pick up iron.
He was sure of it and he wrote a 1988 book about it.
Even other creationists weren’t convinced.
In 1992, Andrew Snelling, a young earth geologist, wrote in Creation Magazine that the frequency generator couldn’t do what Fold claimed.
Then in 1994, Fold visited again with a geologist and changed his mind.
Two years later, he and the geologist Lawrence Collins published a paper calling the mound a natural fold in the rock and saying the so-called ark could not have been Noah’s ark, nor even a man-made model.
In 1997, testifying under oath in an Australian court, Facel called the ark claim, in bluntter words than I’ll use here, total nonsense.
It still isn’t settled.
In June 2025, a Turkish geological engineer, Eszref at published a report concluding the mound was made by a landslide.
That same month, Ken Ham of the creationist ministry, Answers in Genesis, criticized Jones for being convinced before he’d looked at the data.
Which brings us to the one thing every ark hunter eventually leans on, the lab.
Carbon dating sounds final on the news.
On Aarat, it’s been anything but.
Back in 1955, a French explorer named Fernand Navara came down the mountain with a piece of an oak beam.
Early tests based on its color and density put it at about 5,000 years old, right in Noah’s time.
Then the radioarbon results came in.
Five different labs dated his samples to somewhere between about 1,200 and 1,700 years old.
That’s not a typo, by the way.
Five labs, and none of them came anywhere near the time of Noah.
A second batch he collected in 1969 came back at about 1,350.
The same thing happened to a famous American.
James Irwin, the Apollo 15 astronaut who’d walked on the moon, led expeditions on Ararat almost every year from 1982 to 1987.
In 1983, a blizzard turned his team back.
And in 1984, all they found up there were some abandoned skis.
So, a rough few years on that mountain.
A sample brought back in 1984 came out at roughly 1,500 years old.
And the pitch on it turned out to be recent.
So old wood on Ararat isn’t rare.
What’s rare is old wood that’s old enough.
And with the 2010 find, Snelling, the same creationist geologist who had doubted Fold, noted that only one test of one sample produced that 4,800year date.
One sample from a site nobody else could reach.
Now at Durapinar, the science has started asking a different question.
In 2023, a team from Istanbul Technical University, Agri Ibrahim Cessn University, and Andrews University in Michigan tested soil and rock from the mound.
The results pointed to people living in the area sometime between 5,500 and 3000 BC in the copper age.
The Turkish newspaper Hurat carried the story and around the world it got reported as proof of the ark.
But Faruk Kaya, a vice director at the university in Agri and part of the research, said plainly that the results aren’t enough to show evidence of Noah’s ark.
The 2024 samples went further.
According to Jones, soil from inside the formation held three times more organic matter than soil outside it and 38% more potassium.
They’ve also found pottery tentatively dated from the early copper age through the Iron Age, though it was lying beside the formation, not inside it.
And there are two ancient settlements nearby that have never been excavated.
You can connect the dots, Jones says.
Believers hear rotted wood in numbers like those, but none of it has been through a full lab analysis yet.
And this year, they finally drilled.
The project was approved on the 21st of May 2026 under a Turkish archaeologist Sankeratillaa of Cas Kamuret University with Jones as one of his deputies.
Around 20 scientists and students from five countries took part.
They drilled more than 60 ft down in places and pulled out over 300 soil samples.
At one point, the drill bit snapped four or 5 m down after hitting something hard.
Jones said it could be petrified wood or a hard block of rock and nobody knows yet which.
In most places, he said they weren’t hitting any solid block of rock at all, mainly soil where critics had expected rock.
As he put it, we still have the lab work to do.
And no, I’m not making that up.
In 2026, a university team with government permits is drilling into a hill in eastern Turkey looking for a boat.
Which brings us to the mountain itself and why it keeps getting closed.
The story, as it’s usually told, goes like this.
A drone flew over Mount Ararat, filmed something no one was ever supposed to see, and the mountain was shut down.
Mount Ararat really has been shut down more than once.
At 5,137 m, it’s the highest peak in Turkey.
A volcano whose last certain eruption came on the 2nd of July, 1840.
The Turks call it Agriagi which is often translated as the mountain of pain.
Though official Turkish sources say the name means the heavy mountain and it stands right where Turkey meets Armenia, Iran and the Azabaijani region of Nakshan.
For most of the last century that made it a military problem first and a mountain second.
In 1977, Turkey turned down Irwin’s request to search it.
He only got up there in 1982 after a military coup when the new president invited him.
That first trip ended when he fell.
In 1985, Kurdish rebels ambushed at least four groups on the mountain and Turkish officials ordered Irwin’s team down when they were close to the top.
In 1987, Turkey banned exploration on Ararat altogether.
In 2004, another Ark hunter who said he’d spent half a million dollars on ark research asked for a permit and was turned down.
Then in 2015, during the insurgency by the PKK, Turkey closed the mountain to climbers completely.
It stayed closed for about 6 years until the 4th of February 2021.
So yes, the mountain was shut down by a government fighting an insurgency in the region.
But here’s the part that’s true, and it’s stranger than the drone.
Something on Ararat really was captured from the sky, and it really was kept from the public.
In 1949, a United States Air Force plane flew a reconnaissance mission over the mountain, which back then sat on the border between Turkey and the Soviet Union.
Its camera filmed what some later took for a structure in the ice on the northwest corner of the summit plateau about 15,500 ft up, roughly 2 km west of the peak.
The film was marked secret, so were later photos of the same spot from aircraft and spy satellites in 1956, 1973, 1976, 1990, and 1992.
It took until 1995 for the public to see any of it.
That year, six frames from the 1949 film were released under the Freedom of Information Act to Porche Taylor, a professor at the University of Richmond who studies satellite intelligence.
People call it the Ararat anomaly.
In 2000, a commercial satellite called Iconos photographed the same spot twice on the 5th of August and the 13th of September.
Some believers say it’s the Ark.
No scientific evidence has ever shown that it is, but for nearly half a century, it was quite literally something no one was supposed to see.
And the drone footage, this October, an aerial video started circulating that showed a giant wooden ship in a pit on Ararat with diggers and people standing around it.
A fact check by the Lebanese newspaper and Naha traced it back to an account that first posted it on the 1st of October, 2026.
And that account itself flagged the video as AI generated.
A deep fake detection tool rated it 99.9% likely to be made by artificial intelligence.
Same number the Hong Kong team used in 2010, just pointing the other way.
These days, nobody digs on the ark without anchors say.
Since 2011, Turkey’s parliament has given authority over ARK research to a board of five professors at that same university in Agri.
And Jones says every permit requires the work to run under a Turkish university.
The Dupinar site sits inside a national park.
So this year’s dig needed the park’s directorate to sign off, too.
Of course, all of that assumes the ark landed on this mountain in the first place.
And the oldest texts don’t quite say that.
Genesis says the ark came to rest in the seventh month on the 17th day of the month upon the mountains of Ararat.
Mountains plural.
Ararat was the old name for the kingdom of Uratu, a whole region of peaks.
Early Jewish translations put the landing in the land of Kard to the south.
The Quran says the ark settled on Aljudi, which many identify with Mount Judy in southeastern Turkey.
The Byzantine emperor Heracleas is reported to have climbed it in 628 or 629.
Even so, ark relics have been talked about for a very long time.
The Jewish historian Josephus wrote in the first century that remains of the ark were still shown in Armenia.
And three centuries later, the bishop Epipanius wrote that its remains were still being shown in a place called Cardi.
The Armenians themselves first linked the ark to the south and only tied it to the great peak they call Mess around the time of the Crusades.
When Friedrich Parrot and the Armenian writer Kacaturovian made the first recorded climb to the summit on the 9th of October 1829 on their third try, Parrot wrote that the Armenians believed the ark was still up there.
Today, that mountain with the ark sitting on its peak has been on Armenia’s coat of arms since 1918.
And the country readed that design on the 19th of April 1992, even though the mountain itself is in Turkey.
So what does the book actually describe?
God tells Noah that the earth is filled with violence and that a flood is coming.
Noah is to build an ark of gopherwood with rooms inside covered with pitch inside and out.
It’s to measure 300 cubits in length, 50 in width, and 30 in height with three decks, a door in the side, and an opening a cubit high near the roof.
Noah is 600 years old when the rain starts.
It rains for 40 days and 40 nights.
The water rises 15 cubits above the highest mountains and it stays up for 150 days.
When the water finally goes down, Noah sends out a raven and then a dove.
The second time the dove comes back with an olive leaf in its beak and the third time it doesn’t come back at all.
All told, Noah’s family is aboard for about a year.
In the Quran, Noah, called N spends 950 years calling his people back to God.
Every time the leaders of his people pass by while he’s building, they mock him.
And when the flood comes, one of his own sons refuses to board, climbs a mountain to escape, and is swept away by the waves.
A whole chapter of the Quran carries Noah’s name.
And in Genesis, he lives 350 more years after the flood.
Now, how big is that?
A cubit is the length of a forearm.
So the answer depends on whose forearm.
On a common estimate, the ark comes out around 450 ft.
That’s actually why Durupanar got so much attention.
Fasel measured the mound at 538 ft and compared it to 300 cubits using a long cubit of 20.62 in which gives about 515 ft.
Close, but you need the longer cubit to make it work.
And then there’s the ship itself.
A nautical enthusiast named Tim Loveit has argued the ark could have been sleeker than the bulky barge most people picture with floors that narrow toward the bottom and walls that lean out to push the waves away.
In his essay, Could Noah’s Ark float, he argues a weighted keel like that would have kept it balanced in heavy seas.
It’s a theory and it tells you how seriously some people take the engineering.
So, what was really found on Mount Ararat?
A wooden structure whose location still hasn’t been shared, dated by one sample.
Old wood that kept coming back too young.
A boatshaped hill that geologists call rock and believers call a hull with its soil samples sitting in a lab right now.
A mountain that really was shut down because of an insurgency.
And a strip of film from 1949 that the US government kept secret for 46 years because the mountain sat on the Soviet border, not because of a boat.
The answer about Darupinar could come this winter when that lab work is done.
And up on the summit, the ice cap that hides the anomaly has been shrinking since at least 1957, from about eight square kilometers in 1976 to under six in 2011, a loss of almost a third.
One study says the glacia could stop being permanent by 2065.
If anything is buried in that ice, it has a little less cover every year.
I’m Ambrose Wild, and when those lab results come back, I’ll be here to tell you what they show.
So stay close because more videos like this one are on the
