On September 17th, 2026, the journal Nature reported something strange in the bedrock beside the most famous tomb on Earth.
Gravity readings around Tuten Kamun’s burial chamber revealed a hollow zone, and inside it sits a roughly square block, denser than the surrounding rock.
Researchers call it Anomaly 7.
If they are right, no one has seen it in more than 3,000 years.
This investigation follows 128 years of clues from a nameless woman found in 1898 to a DNA lab, a decade of radar, and the survey that reopened the case.
By the end, you will know five things a camera could find this November, and which one the evidence favors.
In March 1898, French Egyptologist Victor Laorray entered KV35, the tomb of the pharaoh Aman Hoteep II, and found far more than one king.
Centuries after the new kingdom, during a period of turmoil known as the third intermediate period, priests had moved a crowd of royal mummies into this tomb to protect them from robbers, identifying several of them with notes written on their wrappings.
In a small side chamber, three bodies lay together with no coffins and no labels.
An older woman, a boy of about 10, and a younger woman whose face had been shattered on the left side.
Because her head was shaved, Lorett first took her for a man.
The anatomist Grafton Elliot Smith later confirmed she was female, a slight woman about 5’2 in tall.
Egyptologists gave her a name that is really an admission of ignorance, the younger lady.
She had no inscription and no identity.
Hold on to her because more than a century later, a laboratory would return to this woman with a result nobody in 1898 could have imagined.
9 years later, the wealthy American Theodore Davis was paying for excavations in the same valley.
On January 6th, 1907, his archaeologist Edward Erton uncovered a small undecorated tomb now known as KV55.
Inside stood a gilded shrine made for Queen Ta and a single coffin whose golden face had been torn away and whose name had been hacked out in antiquity.
Someone in the ancient world had wanted this person erased.
Yet the name of the heretic pharaoh Akenatan could still be read on two of the four magical clay bricks found on the tomb floor.
Archaeology magazine, published by the Archaeological Institute of America, later compared the puzzle to an Agatha Christie novel.
After only a quick look at the remains, Davis’s team decided the body was female.
Davis concluded it belonged to Queen T and published it that way in 1910 in a book titled The Tomb of Queen T.
Later, writers would fault his hurried Clearance of the Tomb, which damaged evidence that scholars still argue over today.
A century later, genetic testing would show he was wrong, and the true answer would lead straight back to the woman in the side chamber of KV35.
That same year, Davis’s team found something that looked far less exciting.
On December 21st, 1907, Erton’s workmen opened a shallow pit near the tomb of Rammeses I 10th.
It held about a dozen sealed whitewashed storage jars packed with broken pottery, bags of natron salt, animal bones, floral collars, and linen.
Some of the linen carried the name of a king almost nobody had heard of, Tuten.
Davis announced he had found Toutin Commons tomb and in his 1912 report he wrote, “I fear the Valley of the Tombs is now exhausted.”
Years later, Herbert Windlock of the Metropolitan Museum of Art recognized the jars as leftover supplies from the king’s imbalming and funeral.
Several still stand on display in New York, the largest about 28 in tall.
The first physical trace of Tutin Commons surfaced 15 years before his tomb, and the man who found it concluded there was nothing left to find.
Howard Carter spent six seasons searching the valley Davis had declared empty.
His backer was the English aristocrat Lord Karvin, owner of High Clear Castle, the house later made famous as the setting of Downtown Abbey.
Karvin had first come to Egypt to recover from a serious car accident, hoping the dry climate would help and grew bored enough with Cairo to take up archaeology.
By the autumn of 1922, Carter later wrote, “The team had almost made up their minds that they were beaten.”
On November 4th, 1922, his workmen struck a step cut into the bedrock.
The staircase led down to a sealed doorway stamped with Tuten Commons name.
And behind that door, the descending passage was packed solid with rubble.
That rubble matters.
Egyptian builders used stone debris to block corridors and hide whatever lay beyond.
And the same material will reappear in this story in 2026.
The Metropolitan Museum now believes the embalming jars Davis found had first been stored in this very entrance corridor, then moved after ancient robbers broke in.
Carter waited for his patron, and the Earl arrived on November 23 with his daughter, Lady Evelyn Herbert.
On November 26th, Carter chipped a small hole through a second doorway, raised a candle, and looked into a room no one had entered in more than 3,000 years.
In his excavation journal, he wrote that it was wonderful.
The polished version he published a year later became the most famous line in archaeology.
Wonderful things.
Apollo magazine reports that Carter and Cararvin quietly slipped into the sealed burial chamber that very first day, months before its official opening, a claim historians still weigh against the official record.
Carter and his team logged more than 5,000 objects and spent roughly a decade emptying the tomb.
On February 16th, 1923, he officially opened the burial chamber and found it almost entirely filled by gilded wooden shrines nested one inside another with the king’s coffins at their center.
It took until 1925 for the team to reach the mummy itself and begin unwrapping the linen bandages layer by layer, recording the jewelry and amulets hidden inside.
A generation later, a selection of the treasures toured the United States and according to the Associated Press drew more than 8 million visitors.
Yet, the tomb itself posed a question from the start.
KV62 consists of four small rooms, and only the burial chamber carries painted decoration.
For a pharaoh of the New Kingdom, it is a cramped and modest space.
And in 2005, Egypt’s chief archaeologist, Zahi Hawas, would describe the burial as hurried.
Nature’s 2026 report put the problem directly, calling the tomb unexpectedly small for a royal burial.
Among the gold was something far easier to overlook.
Carter’s team found two tiny coffins holding the mummified remains of two stillborn babies.
On the north wall of the burial chamber, painted against a bright yellow background, Tuten Common’s successor eye, stands dressed as a priest, performing the opening of the mouth, the ritual meant to restore the senses of the dead so they could live again.
In 1922, nobody thought to ask what might lie behind that wall.
The babies, the painted wall, and the small size of the tomb would each become evidence, one decade at a time.
The first mystery the public seized on had nothing to do with hidden rooms.
On April 5th, 1923, 7 weeks after the burial chamber was opened, Lord Cararvin died in his Cairo hotel room from a bacterial infection that began with a mosquito bite.
Newspapers immediately blamed the curse of the pharaoh, and the legend has never fully died.
In December 2002, epidemiologist Mark Nelson finally tested it in the British Medical Journal.
Using Carter’s own records, he identified 44 Westerners who were in Egypt when the tomb and sarcophagus were opened, 25 of whom had been exposed to the supposed curse.
Nelson worked through Carter’s diaries to identify them, then tracked down their obituaries to find when each person died.
The exposed group died at an average age of 70 compared with 75 for everyone else, a difference that was statistically meaningless.
After exposure, they survived an average of about 21 more years.
Carter himself lived into his 60s.
Nelson’s conclusion was that the data offered no evidence for a curse at all.
Some modern researchers point to toxic molds such as aspergillis flavus as a more likely hazard inside sealed tombs than any curse.
Although that idea remains a theory.
One detail in Nelson’s data even ran against the legend.
Women in the group tended to survive longer whether they had entered the tomb or not.
While the curse filled newspapers, a quieter discovery took decades to surface inside the treasures themselves.
Tuten Common’s internal organs had been stored in four miniature gold coffins, and scholars studying the inscriptions inside them noticed that the original royal names had been cut out and replaced.
In 1998, French Egyptologist Mark Gabald showed that the earlier names belonged to a female ruler called Nefern Neferuatan with an epithet meaning effective for her husband.
British Egyptologist Aiden Dodson later wrote that an exhaustive re-examination of the coffinets confirmed that reading beyond doubt a gold pectoral of the sky goddess Nut tells the same story.
It was first inscribed for Nefaruatan and only later recut with Tutenham’s name.
That raises an uncomfortable question.
Neferuatin was a pharaoh and many Egyptologists believe she was Nefertiti, the celebrated queen of Akenatan, ruling under a new name.
If her burial equipment ended up with Tutin Common, where was she buried?
Nicholas Reeves, an independent British Egyptologist who has worked extensively in the Valley of the Kings, would later argue that almost all of the boy king’s core burial goods, including the shrines, the coffins, and even the famous gold mask, were first made for her.
That broader claim remains disputed, and other scholars caution that reused objects cannot prove where or how she was buried.
Still, the tomb now held two unanswered questions.
Why it was so small and why it contained a missing queen’s gold.
On January 5th, 2005, Tuten left his tomb for the first time in more than eight decades.
Has his team carried the mummy resting in a protective box to a trailer parked near the entrance.
Inside was a mobile CT scanner donated by Seammens and National Geographic.
In about 15 minutes, it captured roughly 1,700 cross-sectional images with the skull recorded at a resolution of half a millimeter.
The scan was aimed at an old theory.
A 1968 X-ray had revealed bone fragments inside the king’s skull, and for decades, that image fed stories of murder.
The CT data showed no sign of a blow to the head.
Hawas later wrote in National Geographic that the hole in the back of the skull had been made during mummification.
The scan pointed somewhere else to a fracture of the left thigh bone.
Some members of the Egyptian-led team believed he broke the leg badly shortly before his death and that infection may have followed while others thought imbalmers might have caused the break.
The images also placed his age at death at about 19.
Has presented the results as a final verdict.
He said he believed they would close the case of Tutin Common, adding, “We should now leave him at rest.”
National Geographic also used the CT data to rebuild the king’s face, commissioning forensic artists and physical anthropologists from two countries to create two independent busts of how Toutin Common looked when he died.
For a while, the most famous mummy on Earth seemed to have given up his last secret.
The case stayed closed for about a year.
In February 2006, Egyptian authorities announced the first new tomb found in the Valley of the Kings since 1922.
Otto Shoden, an Egyptologist working with the University of Memphis, had spotted the top of a filled shaft the previous season while clearing ancient workman’s huts, and ABC News reported that it lay just feet from Tutin Common’s tomb.
About 20 ft down, the shaft opened into a single rock chamber designated KV63.
It held seven wooden coffins and more than 20 storage jars.
There was no mummy.
The coffins held inbalming materials, floral collars, and linen, and a clay seal carried part of the name of Tuten’s wife and Kessanamun.
Shodan told ABC that when you least expect it, something just pops up.
When his team returned in 2010, they opened another 16 storage jars and found a wooden bed decorated with lion heads.
Egyptologist Selma Ikram, who later took over the project, continues to study the deposit as one of the few sealed finds in the valley to escape both ancient robbers and early archaeologists.
For the hidden chamber question, the lesson was hard to ignore.
Only feet from KV62, a sealed room had escaped ancient robbers and modern archaeologists for more than 3,000 years.
For years, Hawas refused to allow genetic tests on the royal mummies, fearing that modern contamination would make any result worthless.
In 2008, geneticists persuaded him the methods had improved enough to try, and his team set up two dedicated DNA laboratories, one in the basement of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
The results appeared on February 17th, 2010 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The researchers had studied 11 royal mummies, Tutin Common, five candidates for his close family, and a control group from an earlier period, and used genetic fingerprinting to build a five generation family tree.
The man in KV55, the faceless coffin Davis had labeled Queen Tier, turned out to be Tuten Commons, very probably the Pharaoh Akenatan.
The older woman from Lorett’s side chamber, was Queen Tier herself, Tuten’s grandmother.
The tree reached back to TA’s parents, Yuya and Thuya, and forward all the way to the two stillborn girls from KV62, a single family reassembled from bodies scattered across the valley.
Then the study reached the woman with no name.
The younger lady found beside Tia in 1898 was Tuten’s mother, and her DNA showed she was a full sister of the man in KV55.
Tuten’s parents were brother and sister.
Hawas told Scientific American it was the most important discovery since the tomb itself was found.
The same analysis detected DNA from plasmodium falciperum the parasite behind the deadliest form of malaria in Tuten and three other mummies which National Geographic described as the oldest known genetic proof of the disease.
The king also suffered from colar disease 2 which was destroying bone in his left foot.
Geneticist Karsten Push of the University of Tubingan summed it up for National Geographic.
He was not riding the chariots.
Hawas pointed out that about 130 walking sticks and canes were found in the tomb, and Discover magazine’s report on the study, noted images showing the king shooting arrows while seated.
The DNA also closed a door many people had hoped would stay open.
In 2003, British Egyptologist Joanne Fletcher had proposed that the younger lady was Nefertiti.
After the genetic results, Hawas said he was now certain she could not be.
The younger lady was a daughter of Aman Hoteep III and Thie and Nefertiti never carried the title King’s daughter.
Some specialists still question parts of the 2010 methods and treat several conclusions as probable rather than proven.
And a 2023 feature in the past laid out reasons for retesting the family DNA with newer techniques.
The central finding that the younger lady was Tutin Common’s mother has held and the younger lady’s shattered face, the damage Lorett saw in 1898, turned out to hold a secret of its own.
Researchers concluded that the injury happened before mummification, probably from a heavy object, and that it was likely fatal.
Has suggested an accident, such as a kick from an animal.
Whether it was an accident or something darker, nobody can yet say.
The 2010 study also examined the two stillborn babies from Tuden’s tomb, both girls.
Only partial DNA could be recovered, and Scientific American reported that it remained uncertain whether they were his children, although the data were consistent with Tuten Common as their father.
The researchers tentatively named their mother as KV21A, an anonymous female mummy from another tomb in the valley, and some scholars proposed she was Anka Cenaman, Tuten’s wife, and his halfsister.
That identification has since been challenged.
Later analysis suggests KV21A may belong to an earlier generation, and the genetic data themselves leave room for doubt.
The mother of the two girls remains unconfirmed.
Consider what those two small coffins represent.
A king of about 19, limping on a failing foot and weakened by repeated malaria, was buried with two daughters who never drew breath.
Has later wrote in National Geographic that royal sibling marriage could bring political advantages, but carried a biological price because closely related parents are more likely to pass on paired copies of harmful genes.
He suspected the king’s malformed foot and possibly a partially clefted pallet were part of that inheritance.
With the two girls ended his bloodline, there was no son to inherit the throne, and I, the official painted on the north wall performing the king’s final ritual, took the crown instead.
In that transfer of power, a young pharaoh was placed in a tomb that seems too small for him, wrapped in a vanished queen’s gold, with his children beside him in miniature coffins.
Whatever else KV62 is, it is the grave of a family’s last generation.
And the woman whose gold he wore for decades, textbooks said Nefertiti disappeared from the record around the 12th year of Akenatan’s reign through death or disgrace.
In 2012, Athena Vanderpair of the Dare Albarsha project published a faint inscription in red ochre painted about 26 feet up a pillar in a limestone quarry at Dare Abuhinis, roughly 6 mi north of Amarna, dated to year 16 of Akenatan.
It names Nefertiti as great royal wife.
She was alive and still at the top of the royal family near the end of her husband’s reign.
That makes her later transformation into the female king, Nefernneeratin, more plausible, though some Egyptologists argue the female king was her eldest daughter, Meritatan.
Either way, the inscription sharpens the central question.
If Nefertiti ruled Egypt as a pharaoh and prepared a pharaoh’s burial, where is her tomb?
Her painted limestone bust, found at Amarna in 1912 and displayed today in Berlin’s Neyas Museum, is one of the most recognized faces of the ancient world.
Her body has never been identified.
The next clue came from an art project.
Factum Artee, a Spanish workshop that specializes in exact replicas, made ultra highresolution scans of Tutin Common’s burial chamber so it could build a full-scale faximile and it posted the images online.
Nicholas Reeves studied them closely.
Beneath the paint and plaster, he traced faint straight lines that seemed to outline a sealed doorway in the west wall and a blocking partition across the north wall.
In 2015, he published his argument under a title that ended in a question mark, the burial of Nefertiti.
KV62, he proposed, was only the outer part of a much larger royal tomb.
When Tuten Commonmen died unexpectedly, the entrance was enlarged for him, and the deeper sections were walled off behind the painted north wall.
At the time, Reeves was based at the University of Arizona, and he told CBS News that the burial chamber of Tuten Common was probably the greatest archaeological discovery ever made, while suggesting an even greater one might lie behind its wall.
He later told CNN that he had resisted the conclusion for some time because it seemed so extraordinary.
Egypt acted quickly.
In September 2015, Reeves toured the tomb with antiquities minister Mambdu El Damati, who said afterward that he was convinced something lay behind the wall.
In November 2015, Japanese radar specialist Hiokatsu Watanab scanned the burial chamber walls with ground penetrating radar, a technique first developed for oil and gas prospecting that sends radio pulses into rock and records the echoes.
On November 28th, Elderati told reporters the experts were about 90% sure.
Alazer quoted him saying Egypt now expected to find another chamber, another tomb.
CBS News later reported his claim that analysis of the scans showed two hidden spaces that could contain metal or organic material.
A National Geographic reporter who watched the scanning wrote that the device registered transitions from bedrock to other materials at the very lines Reeves had predicted.
Around the world, the headlines ran well ahead of the data.
Then the story began to crack.
Watanabi’s full report was never formally published, and a second radar survey carried out with National Geographic in 2016 found no voids.
Even Alder Matti told CNN he doubted Nefertiti herself was behind the wall, although he believed a royal woman might be.
In less than a year, the idea had gone from faint lines under the paint to a 90% certainty to an open argument.
The next survey was designed to end that argument for good.
In May 2017, a team coordinated by the Polytenic University of Turin mapped the ground around the tomb using electrical resistivity tomography, which sends electric current through the rock and measures how easily it flows.
Voids, fill, and solid limestone conduct differently so the method can outline buried structures.
The survey recorded two anomalies underground a few yards from Tutin Common’s tomb.
The team found no corridor linking them to KV62 and the anomalies were set aside as unrelated.
It was a small detail in a long technical paper and almost nobody outside the field noticed it.
The decisive radar test came next.
Between January 31 and February 6th, 2018, Franchesco Porchelli of the Polytenic University of Turin led a team that brought three separate radar systems into the burial chamber covering frequencies from 150 to 3,000 megahertz and scanned the walls in dense grids.
The scans were analyzed independently by the Turin group and two private firms geostier and 3D geo imaging and the three sets of results were compared.
In May 2018, Porceli presented the findings at the fourth international Tutin Common Conference at the Grand Egyptian Museum where Mustafa Wazeri, head of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, released the report.
The full study appeared in the Journal of Cultural Heritage in 2019.
The report concluded with a very high level of confidence that the radar data did not support the existence of hidden chambers adjacent to the tomb.
Porchelli told the Associated Press as quoted by Smithsonian magazine that there were no hidden chambers, no corridors adjacent to Tutin Commons tomb.
His team also offered an explanation for the earlier positive signals.
The painted plaster over the limestone may have conducted radar energy in places creating false echoes.
National Geographic, which supported the work, reported one more detail that most readers passed over.
Porchelli said there was no evidence of doors or empty spaces beyond the burial chamber up to about 13 ft into the rock.
NPR’s headline said, “Hope for hidden chambers had been crushed by science, and Porchelli himself called the result a little disappointing, but good science.”
For most of the public, the question was settled.
It did not stay settled for long.
In February 2020, Nature reported that a new radar survey around the tomb led by Elderman’s team hinted at a previously unknown space.
According to Fox News, which cited Nature’s account of the unpublished report, the team described a corridor-like feature a few yards from the burial chamber, slightly to the northeast.
Because the data were not released, the claim drew little attention.
Critics kept pressing.
In 2021, the Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture published a critique of the joint burial hypothesis, and other reviews argued that the combined evidence stood overwhelmingly against it.
The 2020 corridor claim, however, turned out to be the opening move of the next round.
On September 17th, 2026, science journalist Joe Marchant reported in nature on the most ambitious review of the tomb yet.
The study was led by Mambdu El Damati, the former antiquities minister, now at A Shams University in Cairo, with co-authors Abbas Muhammad Abbas, structural engineer George Ballard, president of the geoysics consultancy GBG group, and Nicholas Reeves.
Their paper published the same day in the occasional papers of the Amarna Royal Tombs project revisited seven major field campaigns since 2015 and added two new seasons of fieldwork from 2023 and 2024.
Researchers from Egypt’s National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geoysics ran new radar scans through the tomb walls and Ballard reanalyzed every data set available.
Within days, the story spread from science outlets into international press reviews, including France 24s, which asked whether fresh drilling could reach a lost Egyptian queen.
Ballard’s reading was specific.
The radar, he says, shows a corridor about 6 1/2 ft wide, densely packed with rubble, leading away from the burial chamber, and earlier teams missed it because they were searching for a large empty void directly behind the wall.
Radar fired from inside the tomb has a limited range.
So the team turned to a technique never used at the site before.
Microgravity.
A gravimeter measures tiny variations in the pull of Earth’s gravity.
And because solid limestone is denser than an open room or loose fill, a buried chamber registers as a faint weak spot.
The team took more than 12,200 readings across about 375 square ft over and around the tomb.
Ballard told Nature, “The data show lowdensity structures with right angles lying parallel to the north wall of the burial chamber.”
Then came the connection that had been sitting in the record since 2017.
The Turan resistivity survey had recorded anomalies in similar locations, dismissed at the time as unrelated to KV62.
The team now proposes five to six chambers linked by passages packed with rubble in antiquity, a network that could extend 82 to 98 ft north of the burial chamber.
One feature stands out.
Anomaly 7 is a mostly low density zone that contains a roughly square area of higher density, which Ballard suggests could be a chamber filled with objects.
While admitting he is working at the very limits of detection.
The proposed chambers show no link to any other entrance.
So if they exist, nobody has entered them since ancient times.
Another possible room lies directly west of the burial chamber.
Although the signal there is complicated by the gravity of a neighboring tomb.
Here the verdict of 2018 and the evidence of 2026 stop contradicting each other, at least on paper.
Porchelli found no doors or voids within about 13 ft of the burial chamber.
Ballard’s corridor is filled with rubble rather than air, which is exactly the kind of target a search for empty voids could miss.
And most of the proposed chambers lie beyond that 13 ft range.
Both surveys could be accurate at the same time.
Look back at November 1922 when the corridor behind Tutin Kamoon’s own sealed entrance was packed with rubble, too.
This reconciliation is the research team’s interpretation and it has not been independently confirmed.
Christopher Gaffne, a radar specialist at the University of Bradford, called the report fascinating, but said it does not provide enough information for firm conclusions, describing himself as pretty ambivalent.
Geoysicist Peter Styles of Keel University said the microgravity data make chambers look plausible, but he also wants to see more detail.
Ballard says he does not yet have permission from Egyptian authorities to release all the data.
And Reeves, whose 2015 hypothesis the study supports, is one of its authors.
No mummy and no treasure have been found.
The team’s larger claim is that this hidden complex was cut before Tutin Common’s burial, which would make KV62 the borrowed front rooms of someone else’s tomb.
What exists today is a set of geoysical targets and a proposal to look.
The decision now sits with Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities.
If it approves, Ballard told Nature careful drilling could begin in November, allowing miniature tractors equipped with cameras to crawl into the suspected spaces.
Many people ask why nobody simply breaks through the north wall.
That wall is covered with painted scenes more than 3,000 years old.
The same scenes Reeves has studied for clues.
And any breach would destroy part of the record this investigation depends on.
A narrow drill hole and a small robotic camera risk far less.
And according to Nature, the suspected chambers lie only a few yards from the existing tomb.
Eldermatti has said that if the findings are confirmed, they could rank among the most transformative archaeological discoveries of the modern era.
Every clue gathered since 1898 now points toward one of five outcomes, and each of them remains an unverified hypothesis until the camera goes in.
Counting from the most modest, the first outcome is solid rock, meaning the anomalies are natural features in the limestone, and the 2018 verdict stands.
The second is an abandoned corridor cut and then filled, which would prove KV62 was part of a larger tomb plan that was never completed and would explain on its own why a king lies in such a cramped space.
The third is a storage chamber like the embalming caches found in 1907 and 2006 holding the leftovers of a royal funeral.
The fourth is a decorated inner chamber carrying a cartou, a royal name that could reveal who this tomb was first built for.
The fifth and rarest is an intact royal burial sealed since the 14th century BC.
Judged by what the valley of the kings has yielded before, a filled corridor or a storoom looks more likely than an untouched royal burial.
That assessment is an inference from past discoveries.
And the possibility of a burial is exactly what keeps this investigation alive.
If a body is found, the story circles back to the woman in KV35.
For the first time, a newly discovered royal mummy from this family could be compared against a published genetic map of Tuton Commons relatives.
A cartou on the wall could suggest a name and DNA could test whether that person belongs to the family tree.
A process that would require new permissions and years of careful work.
The candidates include Nefertiti Nefaruatan if she proves to be a different woman.
Ankaon whose burial has never been confirmed or a royal woman no one has yet considered.
Nefertiti’s face is known to millions from a limestone bust in Berlin.
Yet no one knows where she was laid to rest.
Perhaps she lies a few yards from the boy who inherited her gold.
Perhaps nowhere near it.
Which of the five outcomes do you think the camera will find?
Tell me your number in the comments.
If Egypt grants permission and the camera goes in, we will return to these five possibilities one by one with the images in front of us.
